|
|
|
|
|
Videofeedback
"Everybody should have
15 minutes
of fame during their lifetime"
A. Warhol |
"What
is necessary to change a person
is to change his awareness of himself"
A. Maslow
|
Before I show you how to replace your mirror-image
evil twin with a more realistic image of yourself,
let’s drive a last stake right into its
heart. Mark Pendergrast in his well-documented
book: MIRROR RORRIM, tells us that in 1949 Jacques
Lacan, a Neo-Freudian, theorized that infants
go through a «mirror-image stage»
between 6 and 18 months of age in which they
discover their mirror image and believe it is
themselves, thus dooming them to a life of alienation
from their true selves.
Now, the good news!
|
| Your video image | VS | Your mirror image |
 | |  |
THE MOST OBVIOUS CASE OF A LESS OBVIOUS REALITY
Van Gogh's original auto-portrait which
he painted in front of a mirror shortly
after he cut off his "left ear" is the
photo on the right. (Right bandage)
The flopped photo(video image) on the
left shows the "real Van Gogh" after
he cut off his "left ear". (left side
bandage) |
| |
What can we do to remediate this sad state of
affairs? How can we get a more real, more authentic
image of ourselves? Again, the answer is far
less complicated and less costly than we could
possibly expect. All you need is a video camera
(camcorder) and a television set. Just follow
this procedure:
1. Plug the camera into your television set.
2. Place the camera as close to your TV as
possible or better yet, under the TV screen
with the objective facing straight ahead.
3. Turn everything on and go and sit as you
normally do in front of your TV. Then adjust
the focus so that you get a mug shot of yourself;
something like your photo on your driver’s
permit.
4. Now, sit yourself comfortably and watch
yourself LIVE for at least 15 minutes or more
if you like. Make sure you are recording and
you are the only person watching the screen
while you are doing this. I’ll explain
why later.
5. After 15 minutes or so, rewind your tape
and watch the playback.
It is of great importance that you should
observe what you are feeling, first when you
are watching yourself LIVE and, second when
you are watching the playback. Try to observe
the difference between the two events. While
you do your playback you can have someone
watching with you so that you can share your
observations with him. But this is not absolutely
necessary.
While you are watching yourself on television
you will notice something quite strange about
your image: it is not your mirror image but
the opposite. You might not even recognize
yourself. YOU WILL BE LOOKING AT YOUR MIRROR
IMAGE, REVERTED. The video camera has this
uncanny feature of turning our mirror image
around and allows us to see ourselves as if
we were out of our bodies and looking at ourselves.
Therefore you see your face as you see other
people’s face. Trust me on this one,
it is quite a revelation. Now at last, you
can see the real mask you are wearing and
your right hemisphere can finally get its
full meaning. Another important feature: there
is no illusory dimension. Your face seems
flat against the TV screen.
It is a strange experience. You touch the
left side of your head with your left hand
and the joker in front of you does exactly
the opposite. Try to fix your hair and you’ll
see what I mean. It is so awkward and unsettling.
You would think you are looking at someone
else. I can assure you that in doing this
exercise you will learn a lot about yourself,
about the real expression you wear on that
face of yours. You will probably understand
why people react the way they do when you
meet them.
All right, now you’ve just had a face
transplant and your right hemisphere, the
specialist at reading faces, has taken notice
and integrated your new face and probably
compare it with your DNA. But during your
15 minutes of fame there is more going on
at a deeper level of your mind, there is this
matter of «The Brain Connection»,
that is, the relation between the two hemispheres
of your brain, between the two consciousnesses.
A few years ago some researchers devised a
simple experiment. They wanted to validate
a theory they held à propos the effects
of television viewing. They placed a subject
in a room by himself. They attached to his
body devices to monitor his physiological
activity (blood pressure, skin resistance
and so on). They placed a video camera in
front of him. But this time they hooked it
to a TV monitor that was situated in an other
room, where an experimenter was watching the
subject on the monitor. At a certain time
the experimenter started thinking negative
thoughts while watching the subject on the
monitor. At other times he would think positive
ones. The timing was correlated with the physiological
responses of the subject and what they found
was that the subject was definitely responding
to the thoughts of the experimenter.
From this experiment we can infer that when
you, yourself are watching yourself on TV
you can affect your own physiology, to say
the least. Now you understand why you don’t
want anyone else in the room while you are
doing your video.
GETTING IN TOUCH WITH YOURSELF
The power of television is not something to
be taken lightly. It has profound effects
on the viewer. [The sharks of advertising
have long understood some of this power and
have used it to get into our minds.] Let’s
have a look at what Marshall McLuhan had to
say about this matter. I am quoting here an
abstract from his March 1969 interview with
Playboy magazine. (You can obtain a copy from
Google on the Internet.) http://www.digitallantern.net/mcluhan/mcluhanplayboy.htm
PLAYBOY: But isn't television itself a primarily
visual medium?
MCLUHAN: No, it's quite the opposite, although
the idea that TV is a visual extension is
an understandable mistake. Unlike film or
photograph, television is primarily an extension
of the sense of touch rather than of sight,
and it is the tactile sense that demands the
greatest interplay of all the senses. The
secret of TV's tactile power is that the video
image is one of low intensity or definition
and thus, unlike either photograph or film,
offers no detailed information about specific
objects but instead involves the active participation
of the viewer. The TV image is a mosaic mesh
not only of horizontal lines but of millions
of tiny dots, of which the viewer is physiologically
able to pick up only 50 or 60 from which he
shapes the image; thus he is constantly filling
in vague and blurry images, bringing himself
into «in-depth involvement with the
screen and acting out a constant creative
dialog with the iconoscope». The contours
of the resultant cartoon like image are fleshed
out within the imagination of the viewer,
which necessitates great personal involvement
and participation; the viewer, in fact, becomes
the screen, whereas in film he becomes the
camera. By requiring us to constantly fill
in the spaces of the mosaic mesh, the iconoscope
is tattooing its message directly on our skins.
Each viewer is thus an unconscious pointillist
painter like Seurat, limning new shapes and
images as the iconoscope washes over his entire
body. Since the point of focus for a TV set
is the viewer, television is orientalizing
us by causing us all to begin to LOOK WITHIN
OURSELVES. The essence of TV viewing is, in
short, INTENSE PARTICIPATION and low definition--what
I call a "cool" experience, as opposed
to an essentially "hot," or high
definition-low participation, medium like
radio.
Of course McLuhan is talking about watching
television in general when you are watching
everyone else end everything else. Just imagine
now that you are watching yourself on TV,
would not what you’ve just read make
you wonder? Wonder again by reading what follows
and I quote McLuhan:
• «…The TV image commands
immediate participation in depth».
• «…The mosaic form of the
TV image demands participation in depth of
the whole being, as does the sense of touch».
• «…Technically TV tends
to be a close up medium».
• «…When young children
are watching old cowboy movies, their eyes
focus on the faces rather than on the action
even when it is at the peak of the action».
Therefore when you are watching yourself LIVE
on TV, all of the above apply with even greater
force: the VIEWER becomes the viewed and he
definitely feels the impact.
In November 1969 a researcher, Herbert Krugman,
decided to try to discover what goes on physiologically
in the brain of a person watching TV. His
research revealed that the brain’s left
hemisphere which processes information logically,
sequentially and analytically, shuts down
when a person is watching television. This
tuning out allows the right hemisphere, which
processes information emotionally, and uncritically,
to function unimpeded. In other words, when
watching TV you’re a sitting duck. This
is precisely what Tony Schwartz, an American
advertising mogul has to say in his book «The
Responsive Chord»:
«We are not concerned with getting things
across to people as much as out of people.
Electronic media are particularly effective
tools in this regard because they provide
us with direct access to people’s mind».
While we understand that watching TV is an
extremely sensorial experience, it is relatively
easy to see why Videofeedback is an excellent
prescription (Rx) for the Narcissus Syndrome.
We are thus turning the awesome power of television
to our advantage. Many years ago I asked myself
if on account of this McLuhanian «in
depth participation» of the TV viewer,
a person afflicted with cerebral palsy could
be capable of controlling to some degree his
muscular system while watching himself on
television. I enrolled a young lady in her
early twenties for my experiment. She was
severely afflicted. She could only move around
in a wheel chair. As she was watching herself
on the monitor I could see that some of her
body movements were less jerky and that her
face at certain moment became less contorted
and look almost «normal». At one
point I asked her what she was feeling. Here
is what she answered: «I feel all crooked».
I was really surprised by her answer.
A month earlier I had just read a book written
by a medical doctor who was afflicted also
with Cerebral palsy and I remembered clearly
that he was saying that people with CP do
not feel abnormal nor warped. I realized then
that the fact of watching herself on television
made her feel her own body in a way that was
new to her: «the feeling» that
she was «all crooked». Of course
she already knew that there was something
wrong with her body but she never felt it.
Somehow she was experiencing the distortion
of her body schema. I immediately inferred
from her answer that if she can feel her crookedness
maybe she could start «uncrooking»
herself. Unfortunately, circumstances did
not allow me to explore this insight further.
I have related this incident to you to show
the potential of Videofeedback to make us
aware of this important function we all share:
FEELING. And the more we feel our body the
more we are in contact with reality: your
body is always in contact with reality because
it is always in contact with the physical
environment. Therefore the Brain Connection
is really the Brain/Body Connection.
We are more preoccupied by what we look like
than by what we are feeling. Dr Alexander
Lowen
At this point let’s summarize. First
of all Narcissus was not so dumb after all,
he fell in love with something he did not
identify with: his mirror image. Let’s
be honest, we are the true Narcissists, we
do identify with our mirror image, don’t
we? And we are paying the price with some
sort of narcosis or amputation of an important
function: feeling. But the biggest price we
have to pay is «…alienation from
our AUTHENTIC SELF». That’s the
bad news. But the good news is that we can
claim back our authentic self, our personal
power by getting rid of our mirror image (white
dot in the mirror) and getting a video-image
implant (Videofeedback). A few hundred people
have done their «mirror» and their
«video» so far, and what I have
observed is that they feel more centered,
more sure of themselves and many have reorganized
their lives according to what they «feel»
they should do with them.
After doing the «white dot thing»
some people have told me that they felt nothing
or that nothing happened. Remember this: this
exercise is aimed at doing two important things.
First, pulling your face out of the mirror,
second, teaching you how to balance the two
hemispheres of your brain. With the left hemisphere
you focus your attention on the world «out
there»; with your right hemisphere,
at the same time, you focus on the world «in
here». Practice makes perfect.
As for the Videofeedback, doing it once seems
good enough. Your subconscious mind knows
what to do with the information it’s
getting from this «surprising interface».
However, you can do it as many times as you
deem necessary. After you’ve done your
«video» just go about your business
as usual…you’ve been BRAIN CONNECTED.
P.S. So far I have done my research with television
sets of the iconoscope type of technology
which shoots electrons at the phosphorus-coated
screen. I have not experimented with the new
type of TV sets (flat and thin sets with Liquid
Crystal Display). This kind of TV sets have
a much higher definition and consequently
less involvement and participation from the
viewer. However your mirror image is still
reverted and the main purpose of the Videofeedback
still holds. If you have the choice use the
iconoscope type: less definition, more participation.
Suggested reading:
The Heart of Matter by Gary and Linda Zukav.
Personal Power Through Awareness by Sanya
Roman.
The Art of Feed Forward, the Collage Technology;
surfing the corpus collosum!
Collages are an excellent tool to initiate
yourself to creativity on the one hand and
a marvelous instrument for self-knowledge
on the other hand. For those who have read
the seminal book «What a Cirque! My
general theory of reality» by Jean David
I need not comment further. For those who
have not read it I recommend it heartfully.
Here follows an abstract from his book about
collages.
|